Not being content with that, DB2 9 extends this capability with the ability to implicitly create additional types of database objects. By coding your CREATE TABLE statement with the proper options you can implicitly create any or all of the following:
OK, so how does this happen? Let’s go down the list. If you fail to specify the IN clause on a CREATE TABLE, DB2 works a bit differently. In the past, DB2 would simply create an implicit table space in DSNDB04. As of DB2 9, the database is involved as well. DB2 will either create an implicit database or use a previously implicitly created database. The names of these implicitly created databases will range from DSN00001 to DSN60000. The first time, DB2 will create DSN00001, the second DSN00002, and so on until we reach DSN60000. The next time, DB2 will wrap around and start again from the beginning, using existing implicitly created databases. For the implicitly created databases, the STOGROUP will be set to SYSDEFLT; buffer pool values are determined via DSNZPARMs.
Next up is the table space. Although DB2 has supported implicitly created table spaces forever, there are some twists in DB2 9. First of all, you cannot create simple table spaces any longer, so all implicitly created table spaces will be segmented. In compatibility mode (CM), a implicitly created table spaces will be defined as SEGSIZE 4 and LOCKSIZE ROW. After migrating to new function mode (NFM) your implicitly created table spaces will be created as partition by growth table spaces. The options uses will be SEGSIZE 4, DSSIZE 4G, MAXPARTITIONS 256, LOCKSIZE ROW, and LOCKMAX SYSTEM.
As for the rest of the objects in the list, these system-required objects will always be implicitly created if the table space is created implicitly. For indexes that support the primary key or unique constraints, the names will be generated using a combination of the table name and randomly generated characters.
OK, so now that you know about the ability of DB2 9 to implicitly create objects, let me give you some advice. Whenever possible, don’t rely on it. It is much better, if at all feasible, for your DBAs to explicitly create and name all database objects as needed. Yes, it takes more time, but it gives you more control. You can explicitly decide which objects go into which database; you can explicitly set paramters; etc.
So, this is a nice new feature and it can enable DB2 to do some definitional things for you automatically. But most DBAs will want to continue to do things the traditional way, that is, building their DDL themselves without relying on implicitly